Case Study

The buyer’s claim

The buyer claimed that the garage door was too narrow for his car and the builder would not discuss his complaint, resulting in a breach of several sections of the Code relating to pre-purchase information, after-sales and complaints handling.

The buyer requested the builder resolve the issue and pay £12,000 compensation.

The builder’s defence

The builder stated that the buyer had viewed the garage doors before reservation but went on to purchase the home. The builder also stated it had responded to the complaint.

The builder did not make an offer of settlement.

The adjudicator’s findings

The adjudicator found that the buyer viewed the home before reservation, at which stage the garage was complete.

Further, when the buyer contacted the builder about the garage doors, the builder responded confirming that the garage had been constructed to the correct specification, was viewed by the buyer before reservation and as there was no defect, the builder could not offer to complete any remedial work.

When asked to escalate the complaint, the builder passed it to the customer service director who provided a full response confirming the garage had been constructed following relevant planning permission and featured standard-sized doors, and also explained how the buyer could escalate the complaint if required.

Taking this into account the adjudicator found that the builder had provided an accessible after-sales service of which buyer was made aware, and that the builder had responded reasonably to the buyer’s concerns, explaining why it believed there was no defect or fault.

Decision

The claim did not succeed.

Learning points

For buyers:

For builders:

Adjudication Case HOME007311

Tags

Complaints handling, Garage, Snagging, Sales information, pre-purchase information, Did not succeed, Remedial works

Related Case Studies

Who's supporting The Code